For some of you, this article is going to be a stretch.
For others, it will be a gift of freedom. Those of you for whom it is a stretch
probably need the gift of freedom the most. Life is ironic at times.
I just met a very interesting man. His name is Dr.
Al Seibert, and he has spent his life researching the subject of resiliency.
He often talks about what he calls "the survivor personality." (He has
even appeared on Oprah discussing this, so pay attention.)
We had a very electric, idea-packed lunch a few weeks
ago, because we found we had been coming at the same topic from different directions
and had much insight to offer each other.
As you may know, almost everything Centerpointe
does is based on the work of Ilya Prigogine regarding how
complex systems (like human beings) reorganize at higher levels of functioning.
When this happens, you indeed do become more resilient, more able to deal with
whatever comes up in your environment. Another way to put it is that you gain
a greater flexibility, where fewer things can throw you off-course, off balance.
You become a survivor, to use Dr. Seibert's phrase.
Dr. Seibert has identified a very interesting aspect
of this idea of resiliency -- a group of people who have little flexibility, who
have trouble dealing with change, and who are often (quite frankly) a pain in
the ass to be around.
Who are these people? You'll never guess.
They are people who were brought up to be...
... good.
Dr. Seibert calls it "the good child handicap."
Most parents want their children to grow up to be decent, well-liked, and responsible.
They don't want their children to turn out "bad." But efforts to create
a "good child" unfortunately (according to Dr. Seibert's lifetime of
research), often produce an adult who is not able to cope well with life. Such
a person is, in fact, very often an energy draining "pain" for others
to live and work with.
Are YOU good?
Most people who are survivors, who have this quality
of resiliency, of flexibility, have a paradoxical "two-sides-of-the-same
coin" collection of traits: selfish-unselfish, pessimist-optimist, sensitive-tough,
strong-gentle, distant-friendly, and so on. They have emotional flexibility. In
a given situation they have a much bigger repertoire of possible coping skills.
They can flow with what is happening much more easily. They have fewer rules --
they make up their own rules as they go along, to fit the situation.
Part of the problem is that most "good child"
messages come in the form of prohibitions -- what the parents want the child to
NOT become or NOT do. They use "bad" people as anti-models of how to
behave, and think they must eliminate and prohibit all traces of bad ways of thinking,
feeling, and acting.
A good child is one who is:
not negative
not angry
not selfish
not dishonest
not self-centered or prideful
not rebellious
What the child hears is:
Don't talk back
Be polite
Be
good
Stop pouting
Hang
up your clothes
Don't whine
Don't
hit
Don't fight
Share
with others
Tell the truth
Stop
complaining
Smile
Don't
cry
Stop asking questions
Don't
be stuck-up
Don't be angry
Don't
be selfish
Don't chew with your mouth open
Don't pick your nose
And so on.
Many are "don'ts," others are "shoulds."
All are rules, and the message is "live life by these rules."
Unfortunately, being a good, rule-bound child prevents
most people from coping with rapid change, unexpected difficulties, and extreme
crises.
Here is part of a letter Dr. Seibert received from Bill
Garleb, an ex-prisoner-of-war, after Garleb had read his description of the "good-child"
pattern:
"My need to comment is so strong I could not pass
it up. When I went to parochial school, as a child, if you changed your mind and
could see the other side of something, they accused you of being inconsistent,
or "thinking like a woman." In other words, they programmed you to be
polarized and one-sided, the opposite of what a survivor personality needs to
be to cope. I am overjoyed that I have learned that being biphasic is good. I
like myself better now. It is important to note that, although I was trained and
programmed as a child not to use biphasic traits, when my survival was threatened,
I relied on basic, inborn traits and ignored conditioning."
To survive as an adult, Garleb had to go against how
he was raised. his experience is not unusual among survivors. But many people
spend their entire life trying to behave like a good child. And just as Prohibition
created serious societal problems in the 1920s, children raised with inner prohibitions
cause many problems for others.
Some typical actions of a "good" child trying
to function in an adult body are as follows. They...
Smile when upset
Rarely let you know they are angry
at you
Seldom make selfish requests
Point out your faults, saying "I'm
only telling you for your own good."
Give "should" instructions
to others
Get upset with you and then say
"You really hurt me."
Smile and compliment people to
their faces but say critical things behind their backs
Alert and warn others about "bad"
people
Cannot accept compliments easily
or agree they are good at something
When confronted about something
hurtful they said, they emphasize their good intentions by saying, "But I
meant well."
Fear being regarded as hurtful,
tough, selfish, insensitive, or uncaring
The irony is they were raised from childhood to be emotional
liars. They had to lie about their emotions -- it was what their parents demanded
of them. Rather than being emotionally honest, they had to learn to present the
"right" emotions and suppress the "wrong" ones.
The result is they come across as two-faced. They smile
and agree, then criticize in private. When asked to express a contrary opinion,
they are unable to do so -- until they are in private.
Instead of making open requests (which might be seen
as being selfish), they hint at what they want. Appeals to get them to ask for
what they want, or admit (normal) selfish desires, will have little effect. Though
they act in selfish ways, they cannot allow awareness of their selfishness into
their consciousness.
They must make sure you do not have the wrong impression
of them. To admit normal selfish or angry feelings would be to act like their
anti-model: bad.
Here is why these "good" people drain energy
our of others and are such a pain to live and work with:
They do not give you useful feedback.
Even if they are obviously upset or angry, they can't admit it and talk about
it. If they do admit it, they have a victim reaction (whiny or angry). They blame
you.
They are deceptive. they can act
in ways that are harmful to you but convince themselves it is for your own good.
Their efforts to have others have
only good feelings about them often causes the opposite reaction to occur. If
they get a negative reaction, they work even harder to get the positive reaction
they want -- by doing more of what caused the negative reaction in the first place.
their efforts then cause even stronger negative reactions, which leads them to
try even harder -- and so on. they do not have the flexibility to try something
else, but instead persist with their initial behavior.
There is a hidden threat under
their efforts to make you see them as good. If you react negatively to their ways
of trying to control what others (or you) think and feel about them, they may
decide you are a bad person and punish you.
they avoid empathy. They become
slippery when you try to discuss an upsetting incident with them. they may send
you reeling with a sudden accusation. Later, they may say "I don't remember
saying that," or give themselves a quick excuse.
They have mastered the art of being
emotionally fragile. No matter how carefully you try to find a way to get them
to listen, have empathy, or observe themselves, they will find a way to become
upset. Then they try to make you feel guilty for upsetting them.
The "good" person cannot
distinguish between constructive and destructive criticism. they react to unpleasant
feedback as though it is destructive and has a harmful effect. They believe if
you really care for them you will not confront them about their upsetting actions.
(This is much different from the flexible, survivor personality who believes that
if you care for them you will confront them about their upsetting action so they
can learn from the experience.) This is why a "good" person remains
at the emotional level of a child throughout life.
They feel unloved and unappreciated.
Even though you give them lots of love and attention, they experience very little.
they can't take it in.
They are self-made martyrs. They
blame you for the suffering you have caused them, then forgive you so they can
feel emotionally superior to you.
Confronting them makes things worse.
They cannot handle a confrontation about what they do because the victim style
is the best they can manage. They have almost no capacity for self-observation
or for conscious choices about thinking, feeling, or acting in different ways.
The challenge for someone raised to be "good"
is to develop new, additional ways of thinking, feeling and acting. This requires
courage because it requires stepping outside the artificial shell of "goodness"
into risky, even frightening territory.
Anyone trying to act like a good child is vulnerable
to being overwhelmed when faced with challenges beyond the capacities of the
"act" they were trained to perform and the rules they were trained to
follow. This is why "good" middle class young people, when faced with
real world problems, are so vulnerable to cults. After years of being praised
for good conduct in school, it feels familiar to again sit passively and listen
to an authoritative person tell them how to think, feel, and act in order to be
a new kind of "good" person.
Having a flexible, resilient personality, on the other
hand, is not a way of being that can be learned from someone else. it is not an
act designed to replace the old one. It is, rather, the emergence of innate abilities
made possible by learning from experience and flexibly responding to whatever
is happening.
Hearing all of this from Dr. Seibert was a revelation
to me for two reasons. First, I used to be one of these people, with all the annoying
traits he describes. It was, without a doubt, the Centerpointe program and Holosync
technology that created a shift for me, that took me from this inflexible "good"
boy charade to the more real, and more flexible place I'm in today. This shift
has brought me happiness, inner peace, the ability to get along with people, the
ability to thrive (one of Dr. Seibert's favorite words) in any situation, greater
creativity, and greater productivity in the world. Without a doubt, the Centerpointe
program creates what Dr. Seibert calls "the survivor personality." Ironically,
I'm genuinely good today, without trying to be. When I was trying to be, I was
an asshole.
The second reason is that his description of the "good"
child describes my ex-wife (ex for 4 whole days now) to a "T". She was
brought up to be a good girl, to follow the rules (boy, does she have rules),
and she does ALL the annoying behaviors Dr. Seibert has found in his research.
So it brought a little sanity to me to at least understand why she was so difficult
to deal with and that despite all my efforts to get her to see what she was doing,
she just couldn't do it.
It would be a good exercise to consider to what degree
you fit this profile. How rule-bound are you?
I will be sharing more about this topic in the future,
as I learn more. For now, though, it's good to know that to whatever degree you
were trained to be "good" and to follow the rules, there is hope! Keep
listening to those Holosync
soundtracks! They will create positive change in you.
Disclaimer:
Throughout this website, statements are made pertaining to the properties and/or
functions of food and/or nutritional products. These statements have not been
evaluated by the Food and Drug Administration and these materials and products
are not intended to diagnose, treat, cure or prevent any disease.